NOTHING I "SAY" HERE IS INTENDED TO BE LEGAL ADVICE TO ANYONE!!! Copyright can be an issue. OK, too much caffeine and no breakfast this morning:
#Rc car game nitro nuke full
The you tube films of the RC 58 looks like a hand full to fly quite a bit of wobbling and high alpha. Differences in control surfaces profiles and gear retraction can be worked around and for semi scale probably a non-issue. I was critiqued for it in a prior 106 post I made but, from my view point the outer profile and undercamber leading edge of the wings on both airplanes looks like about a 1/6 106 and 1/10 B-58 could share the same basic wing platform. Like a lot of us, I guess, I tend to stir the pot several projects ahead of myself and many die on the vine. He even passed some great assets to me for a F-106 project. And very good views of the trapeze nose gear retraction.ĭan, yes I met Butch last year and visited his shop. Halcyon, Thank you for those great attachments. If you have so much time on your hands then it would be better spent chastising those WHO are selling various 3 views rather than whining about RCU posts. So are you telling me that nothing else was derived from the B-58 if so where are the copyright issues? Nothing flying today has not benefited from previous achievements. Excellence of design and workmanship will always defy competition" When this is made, a full description should be published as an aid to others. The first difficulty is to get a thing that will fly at all. Like everything else it must be evolved gradually. The flying machine of the future will not be born fully fledged and capable of a flight for 1000 miles or so. "Workers must root out the idea that by keeping the results of their labours to themselves, a fortune will be assured to them. I also have always believed in the world of Lawrence Hargrave So before you get on your high horse can you please outline ANY copyright infringements that have occurred by this post? I produce a lot of material in CAD and have a solid understanding of copyright. Now in this instance you seen to have an issue with copyright in regards to documentation, yet you have not been able to provide any providence in regards to your pointless post. I could go further but it seem you have a bone to pick and I couldn't be bothered. In the USA, almost everything created privately and originally after Apis copyrighted and protected whether it has a notice or not. Now as you pointed out is there ANY notice of copyright on anything that was posted? Almost all major nations follow the Berne copyright convention.
0 kommentar(er)
